|
Iredell-Statesville
Schools
School Improvement
Plan
October 4,
2005
School Improvement Plan Assurances Sheet
Iredell-Statesville
Schools
Please complete the following
assurance items, sign, date, and attach to the School Improvement Plan
for your school.
1. The School Improvement Team
and the School Improvement Plan for
South
Iredell High School meet all of the requirements set forth in
North Carolina General Statute
115C-105.27.
2. This School Improvement Plan
is for school year(s) 2005-06
3. The members of the School
Improvement Team and their position titled are included with this plan.
X Yes No
4. All components (High
Student Performance, Safe, Orderly, and Caring Schools, Quality Teachers/Staff,
Effective and Efficient Operations, and Partner/Parent Involvement)
have been addressed in this plan. X
Yes No
5. Adequate Yearly Progress
and Closing the Achievement Gap have been addressed in this plan. X
Yes No
11. All eligible staff members
were given the opportunity to vote on the School Improvement Plan by
means of secret ballot on 10-25-05 .
The
results of the vote was as follows:
64
For 0 Against 0 Abstain
- For Title I
Schoolwide Schools ONLY
This plan reflects the
10 requirements for Title I Schoolwide Schools
Signature of Principal
Date
Signature of School
Improvement Team
Chairperson Date
South Iredell
High School
School Improvement
Plan
2005-2006
Strategic
Priority I: High Student Performance
District Indicator: District
SAT report
School Goal: SAT scores will
increase from 989 to 1010, the state average
School Indicator(s): School
SAT report
| Action
Steps |
Timeline |
Resources |
Persons Responsible |
Evaluation |
| Utilize
SAT Vocab in Non-EOC Classes |
All year |
Vocabulary list |
IGP teachers, Eller |
Teacher grades |
| Develop
and Distribute a Brochure for when to take |
November |
Money |
Van Buren, Walker |
Student and Parent Survey |
| Utilize
PSAT and SAT scores for recruitment |
October and November |
PSAT/SAT scores, Senior
interviews |
Van Buren, Robinson |
Recruit’s action and scores |
| Create
SAT Center and Student Workshop |
November and December,
April and May |
SAT materials, organized
practice |
Tarman, Lowell |
Student participation and
scores |
| Implement
“4th” Math Class Practice Tests |
November and December,
Mid-February to Mid-April |
Practice tests |
“4th”
Math Teachers |
Teacher grades |
| Implement
11th and 12th English
Class Practice Tests and Vocab |
November and December,
Mid-February to Mid-April |
Practice tests |
11th
and 12th English Teachers |
Teacher grades |
Strategic
Priority I: High Student Performance
District Goal: 100% of Schools
will meet ABC growth targets
District Indicator: District
ABC Report
School Indicator(s): School
ABC Report on Biology
| Action
Steps |
Timeline |
Resources |
Persons Responsible |
Evaluation |
| Deploy
Formal Predictive Assessment Process |
October and March |
Predictive assessments,
time |
Eller |
Predictive assessment scores,
plus/delta |
| Deploy
Formal Pacing Guide Process |
November to January, April
to June |
Pacing guide |
Biology Teachers, Lead
Teacher |
Pacing Guide checklist,
plus/delta |
| Attend
Staff Development |
All year |
Destiny bus, DPI, ACHS,
Jan Ambrose |
Biology Teachers |
SEA System |
| Implement
Inter-Departmental Lesson Plans |
All year |
Information from Science
teachers to other teachers |
Elliott |
Lesson Plan checks |
| Utilize
EOC Review Sessions |
January and May/June |
Money |
Biology Teachers |
Student participation and
scores |
| Utilize
Learning Labs |
All year |
Referrals, Money |
Elliott |
Student participation and
scores |
| Revise
Science Placement for Registration |
February and March |
Accurate teacher recomm. |
Science teachers, Guidance
counselors |
Accurate student schedules |
| Utilize
Data on Biology Students |
All year |
Data: Attendance, Prog
Reports, Pred Assess, Previous EOC Sci Failures |
J. James |
Individual student improvement
on data, scores |
Strategic
Priority I: High Student Performance
District Goal: 100% of Schools
will meet AYP and ABC targets
District Indicator: District
AYP and ABC Report
School Indicator(s): % Proficient
on the writing test
| Action
Steps |
Timeline |
Resources |
Persons Responsible |
Evaluation |
| Practice
Writing weekly in Fall English 2 classes |
September to January |
Writing training, rubric
training, grading |
Fall English 2 Teachers |
Writing grades |
| Administer
Benchmarking Writing Prompt Graded w/Rubric |
November |
Writing prompt, money,
graders |
M. Stewart |
% of Level IIIs and IVs |
| Tutor
Benchmarking I’s and II’s via Pullouts |
November and December |
Money |
Hutchens |
Writing prompt grades |
Strategic
Priority I: High Student Performance
District Indicator: District
AYP Report
School Indicator(s): School
drop out report
| Action
Steps |
Timeline |
Resources |
Persons Responsible |
Evaluation |
| Redesign
Open House to include Freshman Orientation |
August |
Tour guides, Session schedule,
locker combos |
Eller |
Student survey |
| Implement
a Freshman Focus: Mentor/Buddy, Counselor, Administrator |
August to October |
Lunch buddy, Teacher mentor,
Agendas |
Eller |
Student survey, 9th
Progress report and report card failures |
| Extend
the Freshman Focus to include Attendance Focus for all grades |
All year |
Daily calls, homebound,
7th week list,
guidance calls |
Bass, guidance counselors |
Contact logs |
| Notify
Parents in writing of failures and credit options |
All year |
9-week failure letters,
not graduate on time letter with options |
Walker, Harmon |
# of students in credit
recovery, 5th period and summer school |
| Secure
adequate Nova Net ports and software for use during 5th
period |
November to January |
Mulberry, technician |
J. James |
# of ports available with
appropriate software |
| Provide
Drop-in Group |
November/ December, February/
April |
Teacher survey, SAP |
Blackwelder |
# of students in group
and who stay in school |
| Implement
Exit Survey for W2s |
All year |
Survey |
Walker |
Survey data |
Strategic
Priority III: Quality Teachers, Administrators, and Staff
District Goal: 100% of staff
will participate in high quality staff development
District Indicator: District
SEA System report
School Goal: 100% of staff
will participate in high quality staff development
School Indicator(s): SEA
System report
| Action
Steps |
Timeline |
Resources |
Persons Responsible |
Evaluation |
| BAP |
August |
Marty Moore, Money, Materials |
Hutchens |
SEA System |
| NCWISE |
August to October |
K. Beck |
Harmon |
SEA System |
| Web
Page Design |
November |
K. Beck |
Hogan |
SEA System |
| Differentiated
Instruction |
September to October |
Materials, Money |
Gillis, Ambrose |
SEA System |
| Baldrige
Mini-Sessions |
All year |
Materials |
Hutchens |
SEA System |
| Biology
Workshops |
All year |
Money, Destiny Bus, DPI,
ACHS |
J. James |
SEA System |
| United
Streaming |
October to November |
Account, Money, Passwords |
Elliott |
SEA System |
| Writing |
August to October |
Graphic Organizer, Rubric,
Money |
M. Stewart |
SEA System |
| Pacing
Guide Revision |
Ongoing |
Time |
Lead Teacher |
SEA System |
Strategic
Priority IV: Strong Family, Community, and Business Support
District Goal: The % of parent
conferences will increase by 5%
District Indicator: % of
parent conferences on data collected by Maureen Moore
School Indicator(s): Climate
survey indicator 17PART-03STAFF
| Action
Steps |
Timeline |
Resources |
Persons Responsible |
Evaluation |
| Train
on Definition |
October |
Parent
conference definition |
Hutchens |
Consensogram |
| Document
Parent Conferences |
January and June |
Contact logs, class list
checklist |
Kurfees |
% of parent conferences |
| Benchmark
Indicator 17PART-03STAFF |
November |
Parent conference item
survey |
Hutchens |
Indicator rating |
Strategic
Priority V: Effective and Efficient Operations
District Indicator: District
Systems Check Level III
School Goal: SIHS will deploy
MPE and improve Systems Check Level III by 5%
School Indicator(s): School
Systems Check Level III
|
Action Steps |
Timeline |
Resources |
Persons Responsible |
Evaluation |
| Conduct
a PDSA on Systems Check Level III #3.2 |
All year |
Money, time, staff |
E & E Committee |
School Systems Check Level
III |
| Provide
Staff Development on MPE |
All year |
BAP trainer, BAP materials,
Money, LT training |
Hutchens |
SEA system |
| Deploy
Classroom Systems Check III |
All year |
Classrooms Systems Check
Level III document |
Eller |
Mid-year and Year-end %
improvement |
School Improvement
Plan Timeline
Iredell-Statesville
Schools
*All test data return dates
are projected dates based upon the availability of the appropriate
data files from the Department of Public Instruction and are, therefore,
subject to change.
_______________________ _______________________
(School
Plan) (Reviewer)
_______________
(Date)
Iredell-Statesville
Schools
School
Improvement Plan Review Criteria
Part I:
Status
Met Not
Met
A. Goals/Goals
SIP goals are aligned to the
ISS Strategic Plan priorities. _____ _____
High
Student Performance
Safe, Orderly, and Caring
Schools
Goals are specific, clearly
stated and related to plan goals. _____ _____
Goals are based on relevant
data/information. _____ _____
Goals are measurable and
focused on what is to be
accomplished. _____
_____
Goals represent a “stretch”
beyond current performance. _____ _____
B. Action Steps
Methods/processes
indicated sufficiently describe how intended
Goals will be met. _____
_____
Strategies reflect “best practices”
(i.e., are based on
practices that have a strong
research base and/or
a likelihood of success). _____
_____
Actions are innovative and
reach beyond “business as usual.” _____ _____
Strategies/methods are realistic
for the school staff to
implement within the time
and resources indicated. _____ _____
C. Evaluation/Assessment
Indicators
Evaluation indicators/assessment
methods
are realistic for and
aligned to the Goals. _____ _____
Evaluation measures/indicators
use existing documentation
sources to describe progress/results
in meeting Goals. _____ _____
Performance standards (levels)
are clearly indicated
or implied. _____
_____
Results assessed in the plan
can be effectively reported
to various stakeholder groups.
_____ _____
Results can be used to guide
improvement efforts for
next year. _____
_____
D. Other Aspects
Uses of quality management
tools and principles are
evident in the plan (e.g.,
PDSA) _____ _____
Projected staff development
is aligned to plan Goals. _____ _____
Required resources (human,
fiscal, etc.) are addressed
realistically. _____
_____
Parents have been involved
in plan development. _____ _____
Faculty/Staff approval of plan
achieved. _____ _____
Part II:
A. Briefly describe
the major strengths of this plan.
B. Briefly describe
the major areas for improvement that need to be
addressed in a revised/updated plan.
Recommend Approval:
______ YES _____ NOT AT THIS TIME
|